There’s no better intro to this story than the one in the article, so here you go: “In late January 2012, A. J. Daulerio, then the editor in chief of Gawker.com, published a post on the site announcing an experiment. Every day for the next two weeks, he explained, a different Gawker editorial staffer would be assigned to “traffic-whoring duty,” and their sole task would be to publish whatever posts they thought would earn the most unique visitors.”
There you go, the stage is set for a discussion about the tension between metrics and journalism. It’s a discussion that has been ongoing since long before the internet – what is in the public’s interest vs. what the public is interested in – but the economics of digital publishing have really brought that tension to the fore. To what extent is a journalist responsible for balancing the need to generate revenue with the responsibilities of serving the public interest?
Writing for Nieman Lab, Caitlin Petre examines the murky grey area between the two: “While not all staffers drew the line in precisely the same place, a general pattern emerged: Using metrics to inform a story’s “packaging” and promotion strategy was widely seen as permissible, even laudable, while using metrics to inform a story’s subject or “content” was not.”
Look, there’s lots to say about this deal. For the most part I’m disappointed but not surprised – it was always just an ambitious scale play from The Athletic, one that in the long term will hurt smaller newspapers and probably won’t be worth the NYT’s investment. Predictable, sad, and disappointing. For Recode, Peter Kafka explores the whys and wherefores of the deal.
2021 in data and privacy: As tech giants rocked the industry, publishers laid the foundations for their own strategies
Chrome’s cookie delay has been a welcome respite for an industry under pressure. But with no viable replacements on the horizon, publishers wasted no time doubling down on their first-party data plans. Esther rounds up 2021 in data and privacy as part of our Media Moments 2021 report.
We all knew that Spotify wouldn’t be content with traditional means of monetising podcasts. Its new CTA feature inserts brands much more proactively into a medium that has always been much more about passive consumption. We’re protective of podcasts, but we’re willing to see how this one plays out before making a judgement.
This content originally appeared in The Media Roundup, a daily newsletter from Media Voices. Subscribe here: